Fernando Cavallo vs Bautista Leguizamon Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 08 Jul at 04:19 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
F. Cavallo vs B. Leguizamon

ARG
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ARG
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Cavallo 1 - 0 Leguizamon
They have played 3 sets in total, with Fernando Cavallo winning 2 and Bautista Leguizamon winning 1. The last match between Fernando Cavallo and Bautista Leguizamon was at the M15 Salta, 08-07-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Fernando Cavallo getting the victory 6-7(8) 6-1 6-1.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Cavallo | 1 |
Leguizamon | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Salta(07-08-25)
F. Cavallo vs B. Leguizamon H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
48.42% (46-49) | Career Total W/L | 45.45% (10-12) |
1 | Clay | 0 |
1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
F. Cavallo vs B. Leguizamon Match Preview:
- How efficient are the players on their second serve? Cavallo has a considerable edge, winning 43.14% of points on their second serve recently, in contrast to Leguizamon, who has not secured any points.
- In terms of return game proficiency, Cavallo has demonstrated strength by winning 33.14% of opponents' second serve points and 26.18% on first serve returns. Leguizamon, however, has failed to secure any points in these areas.
- Cavallo maintains a distinct advantage in handling pressure, saving 58.57% of breakpoints compared to Leguizamon, who has not saved any breakpoints lately.
- Overall match performance in the past year shows Cavallo winning 45.95% of matches compared to Leguizamon's 41.67%.
- Both players perform best on clay surfaces; however, Cavallo has a slightly higher winning percentage, at 46% compared to Leguizamon's 40%.
- Both players mostly partake in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K tournaments. Cavallo has a modest edge, winning 47.22% of matches, while Leguizamon has won 41.67%.
- Who faces tougher competition? Over the last year, Leguizamon's opponents have been better ranked, with an average rank of 154.17, while Cavallo's opponents averaged 321.84 in rank.
- When matches reach a deciding set, Leguizamon has shown more resilience, winning 50% of such sets, whereas Cavallo has only won 20%.
- What about break point conversion? Cavallo outperforms Leguizamon by converting 25% of breakpoints, whereas Leguizamon has not converted any recent breakpoints.
Editorial Prediction (July 8, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing recent performance metrics, Cavallo showcases stronger second serve play and return game capabilities. Leguizamon, on the other hand, struggles significantly in these areas.
Cavallo’s ability to save breakpoints and convert opportunities reflects a competitive edge under pressure, a critical aspect when matches become intense.
Even though Leguizamon has faced tougher opponents and has a better record in deciding sets, Cavallo’s consistent performance and surface adaptability, especially on clay, suggests an upper hand.
Considering all statistical insights and performance trends, Cavallo appears more likely to claim victory in the forthcoming match.
Fernando Cavallo vs Bautista Leguizamon Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
F. Cavallo vs B. Leguizamon H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 1 |
18 | Games Won | 9 |
7 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
8 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
2:27:1 | Average Match Time | 2:27:1 |
56% (61/109) | 1st Serve % | 51% (44/86) |
72% (44/61) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (32/44) |
46% (22/48) | 2nd Serve Win % | 36% (15/42) |
55% (6/11) | Break Pts Won % | 20% (2/10) |
45% (39/86) | Return Points Win % | 39% (43/109) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
F. Cavallo Recent Matches Played
B. Leguizamon Recent Matches Played

F. Cavallo vs B. Leguizamon Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
48.42% (46/49) | YTD Win/Loss | 45.45% (10/12) |
49.31% (107/110) | Sets Win/Loss | 46.94% (23/26) |
48.73% (1014/1067) | Games Win/Loss | 47.88% (226/246) |
48.35% (44/47) | Clay Win/Loss | 45.45% (10/12) |
50.00% (2/2) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
0.19 | Aces Per Game | 0 |
197 | Aces Total | 1 |
0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 |
220 | Total Double Faults | 29 |
1:25:49 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
311.09 | Average Opponent Rank | 120.45 |
52% (2643/5083) | 1st Serve % | 62% (290/466) |
67% (1771/2643) | 1st Serve Win % | 54% (158/290) |
47% (1141/2439) | 2nd Serve Win % | 36% (64/176) |
40% (204/507) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (26/59) |
40% (1979/4963) | Return Points Win % | 45% (229/504) |
0.00% (0/3) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
50.00% (46/46) | Futures W/L | 45.45% (10/12) |
49% (46/94) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 45% (10/22) |
55% (12/22) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (5/5) |
46% (13/28) | Deciding Set Win % | 40% (2/5) |
82% (50/41) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (9/8) |
18% (50/9) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (9/1) |
11% (45/5) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (13/2) |